Que
o depoente informa que não conhece e nem viu a pessoa de
Rosimeire. Quanto ao cheque no valor de Hum mil, setecentos e
cinquenta do Banco Bradesco, o depoente pegou este cheque do Pedro,
dono da Madeideira do Rio Branco que pertence ao Pedro. O depoente
pegou este cheque em uma troca por dinheiro com Pedro. Tendo o Pedro
autorizado o depoente a fazer o depósito. Conhecendo o Pedro a
cerca de dois anos. Como o cheque retornou sem fundo, o Pedro foi
notificado e o mesmo mandou o depoente depositar de novo, sendo que
novamente voltou por motivo 21 ( Contra-Ordem de de Pagamento). Desta
forma, o depoente procurou a dona do cheque pela internet e
localizou-a , mas deixando recado com uma parente da Rosimeire, o
marido da Rosimeire ligou para o depoente, estranhando os fatos, pois
sua mulher não tinha conta bancária. Em seguida o depoente procurou
o Pedro, que reembolsou o depoente no valor do cheque e comentou com
o Pedro, os fatos relativo a Rosimeire, inclusive passando o telefone
do marido da Rosimeire, para o Pedro, depois disso não teve mais
contato com o marido da Rosimeire e nem comentou mais o assunto com o
Pedro.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
DRUNK DRIVER CARNAVAL IN BRAZIL
That the deponent herein is accompanied by his mother, who has 15 years, and that on the facts was crossing the street when a vehicle hit him from behind, that the declarant did not see the time of the accident, because I fell unconscious . After the Emergency was rescued Humaitá. In this act the declarant receives IML to request a forensic examination. Wishing to see him prosecuted according to law by injuries. Later he learned that the driver fled the scene of the accident, was chased by police and arrested, and still found that it was drunk.. (Testimony before: Valdemir Mota de Menezes, the Scribe)
Monday, August 13, 2012
JUDGE INSPECTOR OF PRISIONS
Report written by Scribe Valdemir Mota de Menezes
The present police investigation was initiated upon request the court to establish the crime of aggravated assault, as contained in the record that on January 26, 2009 when he was arrested, his lawyer noted various injuries to his client Wagner, prompting the Magistrate Judge steps.
In a text written in his own hand, Wagner claims he was beaten during his arrest in flagrante (6 pgs). Wagner was submitted to a forensic examination, which award 830/09 accused a result of mild injury (12 pgs). The Wagner's lawyer informed the judge that the military police Leandro and Fabio could help the police identify the perpetrators, because they would have witnessed the assault (27 pgs). The Magistrate Judge filed the correctional providences, but ordered the establishment of the survey (18 pgs).
He joined the case, the DVC Wagner (pgs 19-21). . The Defender of Wagner, Luciene, testified (42 pgs). Wagner gave a statement accusing police of assaulting him (43 pgs). The officer claims that Fabio Souza not strike nor saw who had beaten Wagner (53 pgs), the same way, the police Leandro Vidal claims not to have beaten and did not even see who would have attacked Wagner (69 pgs). We tried several times to hear Wagner (pgs 23, 36, 73, 77, 81, 106, 111), but it does not appear, having tacitly waives prosecution subject to public representation.
Therefore, I submit the present case the high appreciation of Your Excellency for the appropriate action.
The present police investigation was initiated upon request the court to establish the crime of aggravated assault, as contained in the record that on January 26, 2009 when he was arrested, his lawyer noted various injuries to his client Wagner, prompting the Magistrate Judge steps.
In a text written in his own hand, Wagner claims he was beaten during his arrest in flagrante (6 pgs). Wagner was submitted to a forensic examination, which award 830/09 accused a result of mild injury (12 pgs). The Wagner's lawyer informed the judge that the military police Leandro and Fabio could help the police identify the perpetrators, because they would have witnessed the assault (27 pgs). The Magistrate Judge filed the correctional providences, but ordered the establishment of the survey (18 pgs).
He joined the case, the DVC Wagner (pgs 19-21). . The Defender of Wagner, Luciene, testified (42 pgs). Wagner gave a statement accusing police of assaulting him (43 pgs). The officer claims that Fabio Souza not strike nor saw who had beaten Wagner (53 pgs), the same way, the police Leandro Vidal claims not to have beaten and did not even see who would have attacked Wagner (69 pgs). We tried several times to hear Wagner (pgs 23, 36, 73, 77, 81, 106, 111), but it does not appear, having tacitly waives prosecution subject to public representation.
Therefore, I submit the present case the high appreciation of Your Excellency for the appropriate action.
PRISONER DIED FOR THROMBOEMBOLISM
Report written by Scribe Valdemir Mota de Menezes
----------------------------------------------------------
Dr Hon LAW JUDGE
REPORT
The present police investigation was initiated by executive order to ascertain the circumstances of the death of Antonio Ramos, as contained in the record that on February 12, 2012 at 2hs39min within the Penitentiary of San Vicente, Antonio became ill and was bailed to Emergency the Humaita, coming up with heartbeat and breathing, but died be medicated.
The autopsy report 969/12 points with unknown causes for the death of Antonio Ramos (6 pgs). The supplementary report on the outcome of Anatomical Pathology Chemical Review 378/12 as a cause of death showed acute respiratory failure / thromboembolism (13 pgs). The toxicology report 3712/12 states that Antonio Ramos was not on drugs or alcohol (14 pgs).
The official of the prison, Mauro recounts the rescue of Antonio and also reported that it had bronchitis and was stubborn smokers (15 pgs). He joined the file copy of the Preliminary Determination same collusion and that the case should be filed for not characterizing any type of crime or disciplinary offense (79 pgs)
Therefore, I submit the present case the high appreciation of Your Excellency for the appropriate action.
----------------------------------------------------------
Dr Hon LAW JUDGE
REPORT
The present police investigation was initiated by executive order to ascertain the circumstances of the death of Antonio Ramos, as contained in the record that on February 12, 2012 at 2hs39min within the Penitentiary of San Vicente, Antonio became ill and was bailed to Emergency the Humaita, coming up with heartbeat and breathing, but died be medicated.
The autopsy report 969/12 points with unknown causes for the death of Antonio Ramos (6 pgs). The supplementary report on the outcome of Anatomical Pathology Chemical Review 378/12 as a cause of death showed acute respiratory failure / thromboembolism (13 pgs). The toxicology report 3712/12 states that Antonio Ramos was not on drugs or alcohol (14 pgs).
The official of the prison, Mauro recounts the rescue of Antonio and also reported that it had bronchitis and was stubborn smokers (15 pgs). He joined the file copy of the Preliminary Determination same collusion and that the case should be filed for not characterizing any type of crime or disciplinary offense (79 pgs)
Therefore, I submit the present case the high appreciation of Your Excellency for the appropriate action.
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
STOLEN OF BALLISTIC VESTS
The present police investigation was initiated by executive order to establish the crime of theft, as contained in the record that on February 21, 2011 within the Penitentiary II of St. Vincent, the Administration realized that were stolen four ballistic vests that were saved in that institution, since 2007.
From the Prisons Authority announced the Police Authority the disappearances of four ballistic vests (pgs 05-09). You Rivanil Modesto was heard in testimony and said he was appointed by the Prison Director to present the occurrence of the police station. (19 pgs). Thorough calculation was performed on Administrative ball in an attempt to locate the vests, but the search for responsible by subtracting the left-jackets to be unsuccessful. (fls 27ss)
Therefore, I submit the present case the high appreciation of Your Excellency for the appropriate action.
Report of Scribe Valdemir Mota de Menezes
From the Prisons Authority announced the Police Authority the disappearances of four ballistic vests (pgs 05-09). You Rivanil Modesto was heard in testimony and said he was appointed by the Prison Director to present the occurrence of the police station. (19 pgs). Thorough calculation was performed on Administrative ball in an attempt to locate the vests, but the search for responsible by subtracting the left-jackets to be unsuccessful. (fls 27ss)
Therefore, I submit the present case the high appreciation of Your Excellency for the appropriate action.
Report of Scribe Valdemir Mota de Menezes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)